Life Science Compliance Update

May 25, 2016

Veterans Affairs Committee Hearing on VA-Established CME

On Tuesday, May 24, 2016, the United States Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs held a hearing on pending legislation before the Senate. One of the bills discussed was Senate Bill 2049, a bill introduced by Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH).  S. 2049 is a bill to "establish in the Department of Veterans Affairs a continuing medical education program for non-Department medical professionals who treat veterans and family members of veterans to increase knowledge and recognition of medical conditions common to veterans and family members of veterans, and for other purposes." There is also a companion bill in the house HR 2850 sponsored by Congressman Patrick Tiberi (R-OH).

Panel I Testimony

Department of Veterans Affairs Deputy Secretary Sloan D. Gibson, offered testimony on the bills and what kind of effect he felt they would have on the VA and its operations. Of S. 2049, however, he spoke highly of it. He mentioned that the "VA supports efforts to share continuing medical education (CME) programs for non-VA medical providers who treat Veterans and their family members under laws administered by VA, and runs several programs of the type referenced in S. 2049." He mentioned the VA-established VHA Training Finder Real-time Affiliate Integrated Network (TRAIN), which is an external learning management system that provides Veteran-focused, accredited CME at no cost to community healthcare providers. VHA TRAIN reports more than 7,600 completions from healthcare and public health providers.

Panel II Testimony

Carlos Fuentes, a Senior Legislative Associate for Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), testified as to his opinion on the effectiveness of some of the proposed bills as well. He and VFW both support S. 2049. In his testimony, he stated that passage of such bill would "ensure community care providers who care for veterans and their families understand how to provide veteran-centric care." He further mentioned that more than two thirds of all physicians in the country have received some form of training through the VA healthcare system and that this bill would ensure that the VA is able to continue training both our current, and future, healthcare workforce.

Lou Celli, the National Director of Veterans Affairs and Rehabilitation at The American Legion also spoke positively about the legislation, stating that this bill would "ensure effective treatment for veterans who seek their health care outside the VA health care system." He noted that programs created under this legislation would enhance non-VA medical professionals' knowledge of the "medical, mental and physical conditions veterans experience based on their military service, which can represent a unique spectrum when compared to non-veterans."

Adrian Atizado, the Deputy National Legislative Director for Disabled American Veterans (DAV), expressed some concern with the bill as currently written. He is concerned that currently the VA does not provide continuing education credits for its own professional workforce and that current law provides "a discretionary authority for VA to reimburse VA physicians not more than $1,000 per year for obtaining continuing education credits, but does not do so for other professional disciplines." He believes that prohibiting VA professionals from being able to participate in the program laid out in the bill "raises an equity and fairness question in policy." He also mentioned concerns that if thousands of practitioners participate in the proposed program, that it could "become the source of a significant shift in funding from the direct care provided to veterans within the VA, while placing substantial new pressure on VA's already overburdened information technology system." While he did not mention DAV's opposition to the bill, he asked the Committee to address those issues.

Carl Blake, the Associate Executive Director of Government Relations at Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA), spoke on behalf of the organization in support of the bill. He noted that veterans suffer from a wide range of medical issues that are not experienced by the vast majority of the American population and that continuing medical education geared toward veterans' issues would help to prepare medical professionals to provide more effective care for veterans.

Overall there was favorable testimony for the VA to dedicate resources towards education of community based clinicians on the needs of Veterans and their families.

May 20, 2016

Senator Durbin Asks Medical Associations to Endorse Mandatory Opioid CME – AMA Shows Interest

Following last month's letter to the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), asking the group to "take financial responsibility for the drug industry's role in curtailing the opioid overdose epidemic," United States Senator Dick Durbin sent a letter to four physician associations asking them to endorse mandatory CME programs.

The letter, which was sent to the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), and the American Dental Association (ADA), noted several steps the Senator feels as though the associations can take to address the opioid epidemic. While the letters all had the same goal and the same roadmap to get there, each one was individually focused on the addressed association, using their mission statements to reach out and personalize his prayer for support.

Sen. Durbin believes that "the increased frequency with which prescription opioids have been prescribed in recent years has played a major factor in our nation's escalating heroin epidemic, including an alarming increase in opioid-related emergency room visits, opioid-related treatment admissions for abuse, and opioid-related overdose deaths." He cited statistics, including the statistics that the United States accounts for almost 100% of the world total consumption of hydrocodone and 81% of the world total consumption of oxycodone.

He believes that the best way to reduce the number of Americans who suffer from opioid addictions is to ensure that patients never become addicted in the first place.

Senator Durbin believes that the associations each can address the opioid and heroin crisis by "supporting evidence-based interventions." In part, he recommended that the AMA could prioritize helping physicians be more judicious in their prescribing patterns, while working to protect access for those who need opioids to manage their pain.

Several of the steps Senator Durbin mentioned in his letters to the associationswere: endorsing mandatory continuing medical education programs for opioid prescribers; supporting initiatives that require physicians to check prescription drug monitoring programs before prescribing painkillers to patients; and supporting increased transparency in physician prescribing practices and proper intervention for those who may be outliers.

Senator Durbin, in his letter, does acknowledge that there are "many patients suffering from acute and chronic pain" and that "doctors face a challenge in evaluating its existence or severity," since pain is always subjective.

Durbin HealthExec Interview

After publishing his letters, Senator Durbin participated in an interview with HealthExec, where he was asked whether or not he had heard from doctors that what he's asking of the associations would actually help. He responded, saying that he has heard from doctors in both directions. He believes that doctors who say it isn't their fault, that they try to keep their patients happy and satisfied, aren't providing a good answer, or doing their job. He believes that they "have to make certain they're doing what's medically necessary, number one, and do no harm to the patient."

In the interview, Senator Durbin did not appreciate the idea of training new professionals to not prescribe opioids en masse, though. He feels as though there should be some responsibility taken by current physicians, and some actions to rectify the current situation.

AMA Response

Following receipt of the letter from Senator Durbin, AMA President Steven Stack, MD, penned an open letter to medical professionals to "play a lead role" in reversing the rise in opioid addiction, but did not endorse the standards that were advocated in Sen. Durbin's letter.

Instead of endorsing mandatory continuing education programs, however, Stack endorsed ideas such as: avoiding prescribing opioids for new patients who have chronic pain unrelated to cancer; to register and use Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs); and work on reducing opioid exposure to patients who are already on chronic opioid therapy when the risks exceed the benefits.

Interestingly, on May 17, 2016, Inside Health Policy reported that the AMA is starting to warm up to the idea of mandatory opioid prescriber education tied to DEA registration. This is a huge change from before, when the AMA tended to focus on an alternative approach because they felt as though mandatory CME was too "one size fits all."

May 05, 2016

FDA ER-LA REMS Day 2 of the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee

Day Two of the Joint Meeting of the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee (DSaRM) and the Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee (AADPAC) was lively and full of debate and conversation.

The day started out with comments from the FDA, followed by presentations by Joanna G. Katzman, MD, MSPH, of the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center and Graham McMahon, MD, the President and CEO of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME).

The bulk of the morning was spent on the "Open Public Hearing" portion, where twenty-three participants, from various walks of life, various viewpoints, and with various reasons for involvement, gave their opinion on modification of REMS. Many of the speakers had positive things to say about REMS and CME, including many who believe that CME should be mandated for prescribers who are trying to obtain or renew their Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) license, since many physicians and other providers may not voluntarily participate.  The speakers also emphasized the need to expand the current REMS to IR opioids and to expand the scope of the program to target education towards the entire healthcare team and not just prescribers as pain management often requires several layers of help.

Several of the speakers, including Phyllis Zimmer, a board certified nurse practitioner, believe that the current ER-LA Opioid REMS is not an undue burden, nor does it limit patient access to physicians and appropriate care.

Some of the recommendations for updating REMS included: increase transparency for patients; develop a blueprint for patient information; increase the available range of activities, so that physicians and other practitioners can help close their personal gap, not a predetermined gap that may or may not benefit them individually; standardize REMS while allowing for increased flexibility; educate entire healthcare teams, not just physicians; include in the education other treatments that may reduce overall need for opioids; make REMS more comprehensive, including IR; provide education for providers on how to manage "at risk" patients; launch a public health campaign so the entire country is involved; and focus on education that emphasizes fewer patients, shorter duration of prescribing patterns, and lower dosages. Several speakers also mentioned the idea that REMS should include some screening for mental disorders, and provide education to providers on how to handle patients who may suffer from such illnesses.

The afternoon was full of questions to the committee and committee discussion. The committee did not hold a formal vote, but several members of the committee recommend that the FDA should update its education materials to incorporate the new CDC guidelines on opioid prescribing and other material on alternative pain treatments. There was a real concern that the learners were engaged and to do more work to show changes in clinical practice.

The committee also agreed with many morning presenters in recommending the continuing education component be mandatory and tied to DEA licensure, not voluntary, in order to be most effective.

Earlier in the day Graham McMahon, CEO of ACCME outlined how mandatory CME often is not effective in changing clinical practice and called for continuing education for physicians who prescribe opioids to be voluntary.

The committee also urged the FDA to update REMS to include shorter acting opioids, which have the potential to be more dangerous than ER/LA opioids. Critics of that idea believe that opioid manufacturers have too much control and influence over strategy but several of those who expressed concern applauded the REMS Program Committee for their work in supporting this effort.

While the FDA is not required to follow the recommendations of its panelists, history reflects that the opinions and recommendations of panelists have a large effect on the eventual rules.


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz


July 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30